They use people's real plights for emotional blackmail and manipulation. Sourced, side-by-side, undeniable.
The same voices that branded the removal of sexually explicit material from school libraries as fascist book-banning had, two years earlier, cheered the discontinuation of six Dr. Seuss titles over offensive imagery. Either pulling books is censorship or it is not — the principle cannot depend on which books and whose politics.
An illustrative entry of the classic pattern: a concern is dismissed as a debunked conspiracy, only for it to later be acknowledged as true. Replace with real, sourced examples via the admin panel.
They update the rules while claiming nothing changed. Get the receipts first.